Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 05:47

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What is the sum of X+XX+XXX+XXXX?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
South Africa’s emotional WTC triumph: Proteas win first major cricket trophy in 27 years - AP News
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
How is bestiality wrong, but killing animals for sport or trophies is considered okay?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What Each Zodiac Sign Needs To Know About June 11, Per A Tarot Card Reader - YourTango
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
This Diet Change Could Help You Sleep Better, According To Study - AOL.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Horoscope for Saturday, June 07, 2025 - Chicago Sun-Times
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump administration, for 1st time, returns wrongly deported migrant to US - ABC News